Legal Opinion

Haider v. J.D.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2002No. 20020049PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] J.D. appealed from an order continuing treatment and an order to treat involuntarily with medication. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new hearing on whether a less restrictive alternative treatment is appropriate, and whether forced medication is the least restrictive form of intervention.

[¶ 2] J.D. is a twenty-four year old man who, since 1999, has lived with his uncle on a farm near Valley City, North Dakota. J.D.’s uncle grew concerned about J.D’s mental health and physical well being. This concern prompted J.D.’s uncle to call the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Interest of RNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In the Interest of B.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. NordingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. North Dakota State Hospital v. D.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Eckroth v. B.L.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. MeadorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. North Dakota State Hospital v. C.A.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Interest of F.M.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API