Haider v. J.D.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] J.D. appealed from an order continuing treatment and an order to treat involuntarily with medication. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new hearing on whether a less restrictive alternative treatment is appropriate, and whether forced medication is the least restrictive form of intervention.
[¶ 2] J.D. is a twenty-four year old man who, since 1999, has lived with his uncle on a farm near Valley City, North Dakota. J.D.’s uncle grew concerned about J.D’s mental health and physical well being. This concern prompted J.D.’s uncle to call the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Interest of RNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In the Interest of B.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. NordingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by9 opinions
- North Dakota State Hospital v. D.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Eckroth v. B.L.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MeadorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- North Dakota State Hospital v. C.A.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Interest of F.M.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.