Schaan v. Magic City Beverage Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Magic City Beverage, Inc. (“Magic City”) appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict and also from the trial court’s order denying its motion for a new trial. Dennis Schaan filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, claiming our Court is without jurisdiction. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and therefore, we dismiss this appeal.
I
[¶ 2] On November 14, 1998, a jury found Magic City discriminated against Schaan on the basis of his age and awarded Schaan $125,346 in past and future economic damages. Following the trial, Schaan requested attorney’s fees as costs…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gleson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Porter v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Nichols-Morris Corporation v. Robert E. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Sullwold v. HogerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Eisenbarth v. EisenbarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Minto Grain, LLC v. TibertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Larson v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Hilgers v. HilgersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Redfield v. BittermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.