Legal Opinion

Schaan v. Magic City Beverage Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2000No. 990119PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Magic City Beverage, Inc. (“Magic City”) appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict and also from the trial court’s order denying its motion for a new trial. Dennis Schaan filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, claiming our Court is without jurisdiction. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and therefore, we dismiss this appeal.

I

[¶ 2] On November 14, 1998, a jury found Magic City discriminated against Schaan on the basis of his age and awarded Schaan $125,346 in past and future economic damages. Following the trial, Schaan requested attorney’s fees as costs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gleson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Porter v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Nichols-Morris Corporation v. Robert E. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. Sullwold v. HogerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Eisenbarth v. EisenbarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Minto Grain, LLC v. TibertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Larson v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hilgers v. HilgersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Redfield v. BittermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API