Legal Opinion

Lancaster Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1951No. Appeal, No. 5PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission dismissing complaint against an interchange service at West Chester, Pennsylvania, instituted by Highway Express Lines, Inc., and Shirk’s Motor Express Corporation. The effect of the order is to permit the two connecting local carriers by motor truck to fully interchange shipments and establish joint haul practices, under the Commission’s General Order No. 29, as construed by the Commission, without any proceeding to determine public necessity for the interchange and the resulting new service.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Red Arrow Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. West Penn Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. DiMeglioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Lancaster Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Paradise v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Noerr Motor Freight Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API