Lancaster Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
These appeals are by protestant motor carriers from orders of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission granting the right of interchange to Highway Express Lines, Inc., hereinafter called “Highway,” and to Shirk’s Motor Express Corporation, hereinafter called “Shirk.”
Highway is the holder of a certificate of public convenience authorizing it to transport property as a motor carrier between points within the City and County of Philadelphia, and the territory included within a line beginning at Marcus Hook, Delaware County, passing through Cheyney, Delaware County,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Moderm Trans. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Cage v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Samuel J. Lansberry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- D. F. Bast, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Johnstown-Pittsburgh Express, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission & W. C. McQuaide Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Follmer Trucking Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.