Legal Opinion
Rawoof v. Texor Petroleum Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 7, 2008No. 06-1720, 06-1767PublishedCited by 149 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*753SYKES, Circuit Judge.
Mohammed Rawoof filed this lawsuit against Texor Petroleum Company (“Tex- or”) alleging that Texor violated the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (“PMPA”) by terminating his gas station’s “Marathon” brand motor-fuel franchise without the statutorily required notice and cause. Almost two years into the litigation, on the day discovery was to close, Rawoof brought a motion to substitute plaintiffs, asserting that his corporation, SHL 95, Inc. (“SHL 95”), was the real party in interest. Rawoof maintained that the PMPA claim belonged to the corporation, not to him personally,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Cyril Korte v. HHSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Hummel v. St. Joseph County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Sierra Club v. Franklin County Power of Illinois, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- RK Co. v. SeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.