Legal Opinion
RK Co. v. See
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 22, 2010No. 07-3984PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Harvard Scientific Corporation (“HSC”) and its founder Jackie R. See claimed to be developing a new product to treat male and female sexual dysfunction. Dr. See touted HSC’s soon-to-be success in creating this product in a series of press releases and securities filings. This attracted an investment by RK Company (“RK”). Unfortunately, HSC’s claims of success were not true, and following a bench trial, the court found Dr. See violated federal and state securities laws, state deceptive practices law, and committed common law fraud. Dr. See appeals the judgment, and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus ProjectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Clyde Piggie v. Zettie Cotton, Cylde Piggie v. Zettie CottonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Roth v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Dexia Credit Local v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Morisch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Lewis Ex Rel. Young v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.