Legal Opinion
Smith v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 21, 2008No. Civil Action 07-0485 (ESH)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for review of a decision of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) denying his claims for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. Currently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment. The issue presented is whether substantial evidence exists to support the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) determination that plaintiff is not disabled because he retains the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Darius Scott v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Janet L. FAUCHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, Ronald L. Faucher, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Aaron SHANNON, Appellant. v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Blackmon v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Jones v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Jackson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Perry v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.