Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Berryhill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 2, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-2056PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Paulette Jackson brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking reversal of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for benefits. The matter is before the Court on Jackson’s motion for judgment of reversal and the Commissioner’s motion for judgment of affirmance. Adopting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge G. .Michael Harvey, the Court will deny Jackson’s motion and grant the Commissioner’s motion.
Paulett…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Stephen R. VENTURA v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services. Stephen Ventura, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Associated Mortgage Bankers, Inc. v. CastroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Gavin Michael List v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- McCormick v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021