Legal Opinion
Jones v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 17, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1591 (RMC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Melvin Jones brought this action for judicial review of a decision of the Social Security Commissioner, denying his application for supplemental security income. Mr. Jones has moved for a judgment of reversal or, in the alternative, for remand for a new administrative hearing. The government has moved for a judgment of affirmance of the denial of benefits. As explained below, the motion for judgment of reversal or remand will be denied, and the motion for judgment of affirmance will be granted.
I. FACTS
Mr. Jones applied for supplemental…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Charles R. GROSS, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Valere Poulin v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Florida Municipal Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Hicks v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Gurrola v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Gurrola v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Hicks v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.