Legal Opinion

Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite, S.P.A. v. Lonza, Ltd.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 22, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-0562 (JHG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceu-tiche Riunite, S.p.A. (“Sigma-Tau”) and its subsidiary Biosint, S.p.A. (“Biosint”), commenced this action against defendant, Lonza, Ltd., for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of United States Patent No. 5,073,376 (“’376 patent”). Currently pending before this Court is Lonza’s renewed motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 1 Upon consideration of the entire record in this matter, and for the reasons discussed below, the motion will be denied. 2

I.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Arrowhead Industrial Water, Inc. v. Ecolochem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bp Chemicals Limited v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Chase Packaging CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Boris SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edmunds Holding Co. v. Autobytel Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  2. Filenet Corp. v. Chubb Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. Glaxo Group Ltd. v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
  5. Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite, S.P.A. v. Lonza, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API