Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite, S.P.A. v. Lonza, Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceu-tiche Riunite, S.p.A. (“Sigma-Tau”) and its subsidiary Biosint, S.p.A. (“Biosint”), commenced this action against defendant, Lonza, Ltd., for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of United States Patent No. 5,073,376 (“’376 patent”). Currently pending before this Court is Lonza’s renewed motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 1 Upon consideration of the entire record in this matter, and for the reasons discussed below, the motion will be denied. 2
I.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arrowhead Industrial Water, Inc. v. Ecolochem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bp Chemicals Limited v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Chase Packaging CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Boris SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Edmunds Holding Co. v. Autobytel Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Filenet Corp. v. Chubb Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Glaxo Group Ltd. v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite, S.P.A. v. Lonza, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999