Legal Opinion
Glaxo Group Ltd. v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 28, 2004No. Civ.01-4066, Civ.03-1921, Civ.03-3340 JLLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
LINARES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the objection of Kali Pharmaceuticals (“Kali”) to the entry of a stipulation of partial dismissal on certain claims between Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants Glaxo Group Limited and Smithkline Beecham Corporation, (collectively, “Glaxo”) and Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Dr. Red-dy’s Laboratories, Ltd. (“Reddy”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(c). For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the particular dispute and therefore dismisses Red-dy’s claim without…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Bp Chemicals Limited v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brass Smith, LLC v. Rpi Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Apotex, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Team Angry Filmworks, Inc. v. GeerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016