Legal Opinion
Edmunds Holding Co. v. Autobytel Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 20, 2009No. Civ. 08-149-SLRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Edmunds Holding Company and Edmunds.com, Inc. (collectively, “Edmunds”) brought this action against defendant Autobytel Inc. (“Autobytel”) on March 13, 2008, seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,282,517 (“the 517 patent”). (D.I. 1) On June 18, 2008, Autobytel moved to dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), arguing that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the action. (D.I.ll) More specifically, Autobytel argues that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Sheila Gotha v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent & Trademark OfficeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- HSK, LLC v. United States Olympic CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. ACCELERON, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.