Baggs-Langford Motor Co. v. Moore & Son
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Under the act creating the municipal court of Atlanta, a deputy clerk of that court has authority to take an affidavit for, and to issue, an attachment returnable to a superior court. Ga. L. 1913, p. 159, §§ 27, 28; Barnard v. DuPree, 149 Ga. 796 (102 S. E. 422); Brach v. Oglesby Grocery Co., 33 Ga. App. 481 (2) (127 S. E. 157). The court therefore erred in this ease in dismissing the attachment.
2. Although it is no defense to a suit on an unconditional promissory note to show a contemporaneous oral agreement that the note would never be enforced (Pulliam v. Merchants & Miners Bank, 33 Ga.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mackin v. BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Orr v. Dawson Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Bomar v. Equitable Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Pulliam v. Merchants & Miners State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Elberton & Eastern Railroad v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Staples v. HeatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Taliaferro v. Cowart & Son Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Willoughby v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Evans v. LuceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Posey v. Frost Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.