Elberton & Eastern Railroad v. Thornton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Under the rule that, except where an act is made negligent by statute or ordinance, it is error for the judge to instruct the jury as to what would constitute negligence, the following charge was error: “Every person operating a locomotive must use his natural faculties of sight and hearing for the protection of persons and property that might be crossing the railroad-traclc at any public crossing; and I charge you that in exercising his faculties of sight and hearing he must observe them at places and under circumstances as would make them effective; the extent to which a person operating…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Metropolitan Street Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Davis v. WhitcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StaffordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Georgia Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ware v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Hollomon v. HopsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Howard v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Luke v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Chandler v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.