Pulliam v. Merchants & Miners State Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
1. Where an order sustaining a special demurrer to a plea states merely that the demurrer “is sustained,” and the ease is continued to the next term of court on account of the illness of defendant’s counsel, and at that term an amendment to the plea is offered, and is allowed without objection, subject to demurrer, and a demurrer thereto is filed, it can not be held that the allowance of the amendment was error1 because the original order provided no time for amendment and no exceptions pendente lite were filed to such order. News Publishing Co. v. Lowe, 8 Ga. App. 333 (69 S. E. 128).
2. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hirsch v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Byrd & Co. v. Marietta Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Dendy v. Gamble & CopelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- News Publishing Co. v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Sasser v. McGovernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lewis v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Vaughn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Wagner v. Howell Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Baggs-Langford Motor Co. v. Moore & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Horne v. Harris Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.