Roberts v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.
Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. 1 (Doc. 60). Plaintiffs allege that they are due additional royalties from the sale of natural gas under the Royalty Agreement. The Court has jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
Summary judgment is appropriate when “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). “One of the principal purposes of summary judgment is to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Marquis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Kansas Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farrar v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- Keller v. Diversicare of Council Grove, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- NCWC Incorporated v. CarGuard Administration IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Watchous Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Pacific National CapitalDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020