Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 3, 2006No. 04-4233-WEBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.

Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. 1 (Doc. 60). Plaintiffs allege that they are due additional royalties from the sale of natural gas under the Royalty Agreement. The Court has jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

Summary judgment is appropriate when “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). “One of the principal purposes of summary judgment is to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Marquis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Kansas Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farrar v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  2. Keller v. Diversicare of Council Grove, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  3. NCWC Incorporated v. CarGuard Administration IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  4. Watchous Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Pacific National CapitalDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API