Legal Opinion

Watchous Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Pacific National Capital

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 15, 2020No. 6:16-cv-01432Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS WATCHOUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. No. 16-1432-JTM PACIFIC NATIONAL CAPITAL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Watchous has filed a Motion to Clarify (Dkt. 356), which asks the court under Fed.R.Civ.Pr. 56(g) to deem certain factual findings from the court’s prior summary judgment ruling (Dkt. 335) to be deemed established for purposes of trial. The Pacific National defendants (Dkt. 350) and the Waterfall defendants (Dkt. 354 ) oppose the motion. Under Rule 56(g), “If the court does not grant all the relief…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v. National Retirement FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  3. Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2002
  4. Roberts v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API