Schmidt v. Levi
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Bo Daniel Schmidt appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer’s decision to suspend his driving privileges. Schmidt argues the implied consent advisory was misleading, the chemical test was a warrantless search and North Dakota’s refusal statute is unconstitutional. We affirm.
I
[¶2] Dickinson Police Sergeant Mike Hanel arrested Schmidt for driving under the influence after observing Schmidt’s vehicle traveling in the wrong lane and weaving towards a curb. Hanel stopped Schmidt and smelled alcohol in the vehicle.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. AbrahamsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schoon v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Schoon v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018