Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Levi

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2016No. 20150344PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Bo Daniel Schmidt appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer’s decision to suspend his driving privileges. Schmidt argues the implied consent advisory was misleading, the chemical test was a warrantless search and North Dakota’s refusal statute is unconstitutional. We affirm.

I

[¶2] Dickinson Police Sergeant Mike Hanel arrested Schmidt for driving under the influence after observing Schmidt’s vehicle traveling in the wrong lane and weaving towards a curb. Hanel stopped Schmidt and smelled alcohol in the vehicle.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. AbrahamsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schoon v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Schoon v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API