Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Schoon v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2018No. 20180049Published

1Concurrence

Crothers, Justice, specially concurring.

[¶ 27] I agree with and I have signed the majority opinion. I reluctantly write separately to respond to the dissent's suggestion the result in this case is borne of choice by the majority. I also write to invite legislative consideration whether the implied consent advisory should be repealed.

[¶ 28] The dissent opens by criticizing a purported choice by the majority and closes by suggesting the majority lacks common sense. See dissent at ¶ 37 ("the majority instead chooses to require the law enforcement officer to have given an advisory...."); id. at ¶…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Meier v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Beylund v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. N.D. Legislative Assembly v. BurgumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Meier v. N.D. Dep't of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API