Legal Opinion

Batson v. City Laundry Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCiiARKSON, J.

We think the only material question for us to decide: Does the judge, by reservation of his right to rule, until after verdict, upon defendant’s motions to dismiss the action or for- judgment as in ease of nonsuit (C. S., 567), then have the power to set aside the verdict as a matter of law for'Insufficiency of the evidence, and allow judgment for nonsuit and dismissal ? We think not.

Under the former practice, upon demurrer to the evidence no further evidence could be introduced on either side, N. O. Prac. & Proc. (McIntosh), at p. 615.

In Stith v. Lookabill, 71 N. C., at p. 29, Pearson, C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Settee v. Charlotte Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. State v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Godfrey v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Godfrey v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Lee v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Temple v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API