Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. Queen City Coach Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1931PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stagy, O. J.

The discretionary power of the Superior Court to set aside the verdict in this case was not invoked, either at the trial term or following the first appeal here. Compare Allen v. Gooding, 174 N. C., 271, 93 S. E., 740; Lancaster v. Bland, 168 N. C., 377, 84 S. E., 529. The only point presented is the legal sufficiency of the evidence to carry the case to the jury.

The defendant’s evidence, standing alone, would seem to bring the case within the decision in Burke v. Coach Co., 198 N. C., 8, 150 S. E., 636. But viewing the plaintiff’s evidence with the liberality required on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Ledbetter v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Albritton v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Herman v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Norfleet v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API