Legal Opinion
Illinois Central Railroad v. Banks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 6, 1924No. 15182PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Broyles, O. J.
1. The assignments of error in the petition for certiorari upon the exclusion of certain parts of depositions offered by the petitioner are insufficient, in that they merely specify the rulings complained of and do not point out the alleged error or errors in the rulings. Nor does the petition specify, either literally or in substance, the evidence which was excluded. See, in this connection, Civil Code (1910), § 5183; Lamar Co. v. Lamar, 123 Ga. 667 (1), 668 (51 S. E. 584); Green v. Patterson, 25 Ga. App. 374, 376 (103 S. E. 437).(a) Moreover, it appears from the petition for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. C. C. Whitnack Produce Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Henderson v. Maysville Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Griffin v. WiseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Green v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Clark Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Barron Bros. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- White v. DilworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Cohen v. FinkovitchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Daugherty-McKey & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929