Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Daugherty-McKey & Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) As will be seen from the above statement, the plaintiff has expressly -sued in tort, and we are not concerned with any question as to what might have been its rights under some other form of action. The ultimate question for determination is whether the petition shows any breach of duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, with resulting damage to the latter.
That the demurrage charges were illegal can not be reasonably controverted under the facts alleged. According to the averments, there was no delivery to the consignee at Hampton, nor any offer of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- German American Mutual Life Ass'n v. FarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. BeahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hotel Equipment Co. v. LiddellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.