Legal Opinion

United States v. Byrd

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 8, 1999No. NMCM 9500907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SEFTON, Chief Judge:

After careful consideration of the Government’s Motion to Terminate Appellate Review of 19 February 1999, appellant’s response, and the excellent oral arguments by counsel before us, it is, by the court, this 8th day of April, 1999,

ORDERED:

That the Government’s motion is granted. This court’s previous mandate of 20 November 1998 is rescinded and the Government is no longer required by this court to conduct a post-trial DuBay1 hearing.

On 15 October 1996, this court affirmed the findings and sentence of appellant’s 12 January 1995 general court-martial. A copy of this…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. Carter v. McClaughrySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Noyd v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API