Eureka Fire Hose Co. v. Eureka Rubber Manufacturing Co.

Embry, Y. C.

The bill in this case was purely an injunction bill, the terms of the injunction were defined by the decree, and on appeal the decree was affirmed. The injunction, issued after affirmance on appeal, follows precisely the terms of the decree. The present application to modify the injunction is therefore substantially an application to modify the final decree after its affirmance on appeal.

The final decree recited

“that the use of the word or name ’Eureka’ by the defendant in its corporate title, or otherwise, in connection with the marketing of conductive hose in competition with…