City of Fairfield v. Dashiell
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.
At all times in controversy herein, John W. Wheatley was the owner of a farm consisting of 357 acres. To the south thereof, with a highway intervening, the city of Fairfield was the owner of a quarter section of land. A small natural water course ran across the land of the city and Wheatley in a northerly and southerly direction.
In the spring of 1925, the city of Fairfield was desirous of creating a reservoir, known in the record as No. 3, for impounding water for use in its waterworks. The dam was constructed across said waterway at a point about 120 rods south of the highway, and was 175…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Delbridge v. SearsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Stodghill v. C., B. & Q. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Mabson v. ChristSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Adams County v. B. & M. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Barbour v. TompkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wheatley v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Bagley v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Kallem v. KallemSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941