Legal Opinion

City of Fairfield v. Dashiell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 20, 1933No. 41924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

At all times in controversy herein, John W. Wheatley was the owner of a farm consisting of 357 acres. To the south thereof, with a highway intervening, the city of Fairfield was the owner of a quarter section of land. A small natural water course ran across the land of the city and Wheatley in a northerly and southerly direction.

In the spring of 1925, the city of Fairfield was desirous of creating a reservoir, known in the record as No. 3, for impounding water for use in its waterworks. The dam was constructed across said waterway at a point about 120 rods south of the highway, and was 175…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Delbridge v. SearsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Stodghill v. C., B. & Q. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. Mabson v. ChristSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Adams County v. B. & M. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Barbour v. TompkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wheatley v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. Bagley v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  3. Kallem v. KallemSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API