Legal Opinion
Hollander v. Mascuch
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided January 12, 1945No. Docket 123/149PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
This is an application by A. Langstaff Johnston, Jr., for the modification of two orders in the above action; one dated October 3d 1942, and the other dated November 12th, 1942.
The original decree in this matter was advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder as a result of his opinion reported in131 N.J. Eq. 585, and affirmed by the Court of Errors and Appeals in 131 N.J. Eq. 613. Vice-Chancellor Fielder determined that A. Langstaff Johnston, Jr., and other directors of the defendant corporation had grossly mismanaged the business and affairs of the company for their personal benefit "in wanton…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hollander v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Eureka Fire Hose Co. v. Eureka Rubber Manufacturing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
- Hollander v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Hollander v. MascuchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hollander v. MascuchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945