Legal Opinion

Englander v. McKesson-roeber-kuebler Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 19, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The right to use the name Silver Crest as a trade-mark for gin and other alcoholic beverages is the object of the litigation. McKesson Robbins, Incorporated, and Englander, each claiming to own the mark, seeks to restrain the other from using it.

McKesson and its predecessors had been manufacturers of drugs for many years. Its subsidiary corporations were scattered throughout the country, doing a wholesale business. With the approach of repeal of the prohibition amendment, it organized Spirits Import Company to engage in the liquor business, especially around New York, and it had its wholesale…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Chadwick v. CovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. A. & P. Trucking Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API