Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert Savani

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 10, 2013No. 11-4359, 11-4494, 12-1034PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

The question presented in this consolidated appeal is whether appellants, Albert Savani, Sean Herbert, and Richard Roe,1 are eligible for reductions of their sentences pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). In each case, the appellant was convicted of a cocaine base (crack) related offense, the government moved for a downward departure due to the appellant’s substantial assistance, and the District Court granted the departure and sentenced the defendant below the statutory mandatory minimum. Shortly thereafter, the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA) became law, and the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Barber v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re SEALED CASECourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Lance WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. Jakomas v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. United States v. Joseph NagleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Michael CalabrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API