Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Nagle

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 30, 2015No. 14-3184, 14-3422PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Joseph Nagle and Ernest Fink were co-owners and executives of concrete manufacturing and construction businesses. The businesses entered into a relationship with a company owned by a person of Filipino descent. His company would bid for subcontracts on Pennsylvania transportation projects as a disadvantaged business enterprise. If his company won the bid for the subcontract, Nagle and Fink’s businesses would perform all of the work.

Fink pled guilty'to one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States. Nagle proceeded to trial, where a jury found…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Bikundi, Sr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Thomas HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Randy PoulsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Binyamin StimlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Kenneth CarterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API