Legal Opinion
Jakomas v. City of Pittsburgh
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 24, 2018No. 2:16-cv-00220PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mark R. Hornak, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Dawn Jakomas ("Plaintiff") was diagnosed with potentially cancerous tumors and her former employer-the City of Pittsburgh (the "City")-was made aware of that. Though later found to be non-cancerous, Plaintiff's tumors required surgery. Plaintiff took an approximately one-year, City-approved leave from her employment, beginning in February, 2014, for treatment. Plaintiff contends that she was demoted on the day before her leave began, and then filed a Charge of Discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "EEOC")…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Sabo v. UPMC AltoonaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Anderson v. Bright Horizons Children's Ctrs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Allen v. Lackawanna County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- BARSODY v. CLEARFIELD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- CAGNETTI v. JUNIPER VILLAGE AT BENSALEM OPERATIONSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.