Legal Opinion

Carroll v. City of Portland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 16, 1999PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.

[¶ 1] Charles Carroll appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superi- or Court (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) in favor of Scarborough Police Officer Joseph Giacomantonio on Carroll’s defamation claim. Carroll contends that the court erred in concluding that: (1) no genuine dispute of material fact existed; and (2) Giacomantonio was immune from liability under the Maine Tort Claims Act (“MTCA”), 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 8101-8118 (1980 & Supp.1998).1 We conclude that Giacomantonio failed to sustain his burden of proving that he was entitled to immunity under the MTCA, and therefore vacate the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ransom v. City of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. MacKerron v. MaduraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Moore v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Adriance v. Town of StandishSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Leach v. BettersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Santoni v. Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Burdzel v. SobusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  4. Morgan v. KooistraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  5. Tolliver v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API