Legal Opinion

Radcliff v. Radford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1882No. 9355Published

From the Morgan Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition for a Rehearing.

Bicknell, C. C.

The appellants insist that this is a case where the money belonging to the wife at the time of the marriage became, under the law then in force, her husband’s money, and that when he used the same in the purchase of land, and took the deed therefor in his own name, the land became his absolutely, and was not subject to any trust in favor of his wife.

It is claimed that this ease is governed by Waldron v. Sanders, 85 Ind. 270, and Westerfield v. Kimmer, 82 Ind. 365. In these cases it was decided that, prior to the legislation of 1852, the money of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Elliott v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Blair v. BassIndiana Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Westerfield v. KimmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Jenison v. GravesIndiana Supreme Court · 1831
  5. Smith v. TatmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API