Legal Opinion
Smith v. Tatman
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1880No. 7238PublishedCited by 14 opinions
From tlie Fulton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
In this action, the appellee sued the appellant and one William R. R. Tatman, upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“ 85.00. March 27th, 1876. One day after date, I promise to pay to the order of W. M. Tatman eighty-five dollars, with ten per cent, attorney's fees if suit be instituted on this note, value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws, with interest at the rate of ten per cent. The drawers and endorsers severally waive presentment for payment and notice of protest and non-payment of this note.
(Signed,) “ W. R. R. Tatman.”
Credit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brewster v. WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Holden v. Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Smith v. DoddsIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Lewis v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Teal v. SpanglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- McGlennan v. MargowskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Smith v. KylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Becknell v. BecknellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Bake v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.