Elliott v. Armstrong
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Dearborn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
This is a suit in chancery from the Dearborn Circuit Court. Armstrong was the complainant below, and Elliott the defendant. It is the case of a cestui que trust, demanding a conveyance of real estate from his trustee.
The bill states, that Vance and Dill, being indebted to Elliott in the sum of 67 dollars and 56 cents for cooper’s work, gave him their due-bill, dated the 15th of March, 1805; and thereby acknowledged themselves indebted in that amount to Elliott or order;—that shortly afterwards, Vance, for the purpose of paying the said note, proposed to let Elliott have a town lot, numbered…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boyd v. M'LeanNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Kerr v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Whitney v. M'KinneyNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Radcliff v. RadfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Learned v. TritchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- Marion Trucking, Inc. v. Harwood Trucking, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1954
- Myers v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.