Legal Opinion

Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. Morris

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 5, 1930No. 28,382; No. 29,140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

Two original proceedings in mandamus have been consolidated to be heard and tried together.

The first case was brought by the Fidelity National Bank and Trust Company against the board of supervisors of drainage district No. 1 in Lyon county, and recently the county clerk of Lyon county was made a party defendant. This case involves the question of the right of the plaintiff to a levy of a tax on the land in the drainage district to pay the plaintiff for money borrowed to meet the necessary cost and expense of the organization and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weber Engine Co. v. AlterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Nolte v. Montgomery Home Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Waters v. TrovilloSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Hall Lithographing Co. v. CristSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Drainage District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. McCall v. GoodeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Board of Trustees of Drainage District No. 1 v. GlotfelterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API