Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Drainage District No. 1

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1931No. 30,284; No. 30,293PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

These are consolidated appeals from judgments of the district court of Lyon county wherein the appellant railway companies were denied injunctions to restrain the collection of certain taxes imposed on their property by the defendant drainage district and denied recovery of certain taxes paid by them under protest.

The litigation grows out of certain proceedings heretofore undertaken to create a drainage district in Lyon county. The purposes for which the district was organized were found to be impracticable and the project was abandoned, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Roby v. Shunganunga Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Bateman v. FranklinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wirt v. EsreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Krouser v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Beacon Publishing Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Allen v. BurkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Hedges v. City Commission of City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API