Legal Opinion

In re Palmer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1984No. Nos. 83-1409 and 83-180PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

For the reasons set forth below we find permanent custody was properly granted to the Stark County Welfare Department. Accordingly we affirm the natural mother case, No. 83-1409, and declare the foster parent case, No. 83-180, to be moot in light of the former holding.

I

Appellant, Cathleen Pihlblad, raises three issues on appeal. The first issue avers that appellant’s residual parental rights, pursuant to R.C. 2151.01(B)(11) and 5103.16, were violated since she was not allowed to contest the custody determination by interposing her residual adoptive right.

The record clearly indicates, contrary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jenkins v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Pasqualone v. PasqualoneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gates Mills Investment Co. v. ParksOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Trauth v. DunbarOhio Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rosen v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Moore v. GoellerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re R.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Byard v. BylerOhio Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API