Legal Opinion
Pasqualone v. Pasqualone
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1980No. 79-1491PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C. J.
The issue before this court is whether appellant, Bridget Pasqualone, is entitled to a writ of habeas corpus giving her custody of Jennifer.
There is much discussion of the effect of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), R. C. 3109.21 through 3109.37. It is under these provisions that appellee, David Pasqualone, brought an action seeking permanent custody of Jennifer. Appellee, however, never informed the trial court, in bringing his action for custody, that another action was pending in Illinois.
R. C. 3109.27 states in part:
“(A) Every party in a custody proceeding, in his first…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Bechtol v. BechtolOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Moore v. GoellerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Interest of LWNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.