Legal Opinion

Trauth v. Dunbar

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1983No. 82-274PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

I

In light of the disposition of this case by the court of appeals, we must first examine whether the issue of Spartan’s liability for punitive damages was properly before the jury.

Appellant argues that the following facts establish a basis for awarding punitive damages against Spartan:

“(1) Spartan’s agents shouted at the children to move away from their original safe play area, causing Jun Ku An to move to the mud puddle near the blacktopped area.
“(2) Spartan paid Dunbar for the use of his automobile and required him to use it in his employment. Spartan further required Dunbar to drive into *70th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mast v. Doctor's Hospital NorthOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cox v. Oliver MacHinery Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Carney v. Knollwood Cemetery Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Bland v. GravesOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. In re PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API