Legal Opinion

People v. Sarnblad

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1972No. Crim. 21392PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, Acting P. J.

The People appeal from order dismissing information charging defendant with a violation of section 311.2, Penal Code— knowingly exhibiting to others obscene matter, to wit, a motion picture— and a prior conviction of the same section-, after defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to section 995, Penal Code, was granted.

On July 15, 1971, Officer Kimber served a search warrant for three described films at the Por-No Theater, 1610 North Cahuenga, Los Angeles; when he arrived defendant was absent but he displayed the search warrant to an employee who then assisted him…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ginzburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Aday v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Whack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. State v. HaliskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. People v. SaezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API