People v. Saez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUMES, P. J. —
A jury found Jose Saez guilty of attempted murder and found true allegations that the crime was willful, deliberate, and premeditated, that he personally inflicted great bodily injury on the victim, and that he personally used a deadly weapon.1 The trial court found he was the same person convicted of two prior crimes in Wisconsin (the identity finding), and *1181after the jury found the convictions true, the court ruled that they were serious felonies and strikes.2
On appeal, Saez raises four main categories of arguments. First, he contends the premeditation allegation was…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. WoodellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. DenardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. NavaretteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.