Legal Opinion

Whack v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1995No. 73PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

Once more we must construe criminal statutes that impose an enhanced penalty on certain offenders. In this appeal we are called upon to determine the meaning of the word “convicted” as it is used in Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl.Vol., 1993 Cum.Supp.) Article 27, § 286(c) and § 293.1 Section 286(c) mandates that a defendant who “previously has been convicted” of certain controlled dangerous substances offenses receive a 10-year minimum sentence of imprisonment, without the possibility of parole. Section 293(a) permits a sentence enhancement of twice the term of imprisonment or…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Derry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Ross v. State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Blondell v. Baltimore City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Gardner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API