Metroil, Inc. v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is before the court on the defendants’ motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. The plaintiff is the operator of an Exxon-branded retail gas station in the District of Columbia. Defendants Exxon-Mobil Corporation (“ExxonMobil”) and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation (“ExxonMobil Oil” and, together with ExxonMobil, “the ExxonMobil defendants”) are engaged in the business of oil production and refining. Until June 2009, the plaintiff leased the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- D.C. Oil, Inc. v. Exxonmobil Oil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- D.C. Oil, Inc. v. Exxonmobil Oil CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010