Burke v. Fields
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Examinations to determine merit and fitness for appointments and promotions in the civil service of the State, as contemplated by the State Constitution (art. V, § 6), should be of such nature as will best test the candidates with respect to the qualities demanded by the positions to which they aspire. Insofar as possible, merit and fitness should be measured by objective standards, but determination of fitness for some positions, particularly those which require executive and intellectual ability and broad cultural learning, cannot always be based on objectivity solely. In such cases, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sloat v. Board of Examiners of the Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Matter of Bridgman v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Bridgman v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Barnett v. FieldsNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Barnett v. FieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gimprich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Nelson v. Board of ExaminersNew York Court of Appeals · 1968