Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Fields
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 1949PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
This proceeding was instituted by the petitioner, pursuant to the provisions of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, for an order setting aside the respondents’ determination that the petitioner failed an examination for license as principal of a high school because his “record ” was “ unsatisfactory ”, and requiring respondents to certify that petitioner passed said examination and is eligible for licensing as such principal, and to place his name on an alleged list of eligibles for said position.
Petitioner here moves for an order setting aside the respondents’ determination and certifying…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Matter of Larkin Co. v. SchwabNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- People Ex Rel. Schau v. . McWilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Matter of Marburg v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Matter of Fink v. FineganNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Sloat v. Board of Examiners of the Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chance v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Civil Service Commission v. FrazziniSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- 7 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1207, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9288 Boston M. Chance v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, the Board of Examiners, Charles Wiener (Pro Se), Proposed Defendant-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Burke v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Acker v. BermanNew York Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.