Legal Opinion

Sloat v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1937PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The petitioner, since 1927, has been a substitute teacher in the fine arcs in the high schools of the city of New York. With the exception of an absence of eleven months in 1931 she has taught on “ full time ” each year. Her work as teacher has been satisfactory to the principals of the schools in which she taught. For some years prior to October 31, 1934, no appointments were made by the Board of Education to vacant positions upon the teaching staff of the city. Instead, substitute teachers were temporarily assigned to teach the classes where no regular teacher was available. After this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Fink v. FineganNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Matter of KeymerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Matter of Barthelmess v. . CukorNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Matter of Scahill v. DrzewuckiNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Matter of Jaffe v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Tucker v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Almassy v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. McGowan v. BursteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Wood v. IrvingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API