Legal Opinion

Weiszmann v. Kirkland and Ellis

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 9, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-B-534PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Ronald F. Weiszmann (Weisz-mann), an attorney licensed in Colorado, filed this action pro se under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1961-1968 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1381, 1332, 1334(b). The matters before me are: 1) defendants Oakbrook Corporation (Oakbrook) and Tom Klein’s (collectively the Oakbrook defendants) motion to dismiss plaintiff Ronald F. Weisz-mann’s (Weiszmann) second, third, and eighth claims for relief and motion for attorneys fees; 2) defendants Kirkland and Ellis, Andrew J.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Tinder v. Lewis County Nursing Home Dist.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2001
  2. Yucyco, Ltd. v. Republic of SloveniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. In re Riddell Concussion Reduction LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. Brooks v. Bank of BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
  5. Morrison v. Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C.District Court, D. Colorado · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API