Legal Opinion

Mooers c. Northern Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1897No. Nos. 10,586—(157)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbe district court for Morrison county, Searle, J., denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Action to recover tbe value of four borses killed by one of defendant’s passenger trains, in wbicb the court below directed a verdict for defendant when tbe parties closed tbe evidence.

At the argument in this court, counsel for plaintiff practically waived tbe question of defendant’s negligence in failing to keep closed a gate in tbe fence along its right of way, through wbicb open gateway it appeared that tbe borses went upon tbe track, and rested bis claim for a reversal upon tbe ground that there was evidence which would have supported a finding that tbe trainmen failed to use reasonable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scheffler v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Christenson v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
  3. Hepfel v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lindemann v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Kommerstad v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Harper v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Best v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Clement v. Adams Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API