Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mancil

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 10, 1928No. 4 Div. 371PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The petitioner was indicted, tried, and convicted of a felony in the circuit court of Pike county, and, as stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, 116 So. 907, “at the time of sentence, notice of appeal was given, but the court refused to suspend the judgment pending the appeal, because no exceptions were reserved.”

Contending that a suspension of the execution of the judgment by the trial court pending his appeal, and on his election, is a matter of right, he applied to the Court of Appeals for mandamus to the trial court to compel such suspension.

The Court of Appeals denied the prayer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  2. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  4. Bolling v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Ex parte CameronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Jiles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Jackson v. NesmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Mancil v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. State v. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API